
Here we go again, dressed up as responsibility.
This week, The Manila Times reported that the Philippines is considering mandatory social media user verification to curb abuse. The pitch is neat and comforting. Order over chaos. Safety over noise. Names over anonymity. The subtext is even clearer: if everyone can be identified, everyone can be managed.
That is not about stopping abuse.
That is about silencing critics.
Verification does not scare bots. It does not deter organized trolls. It does not dismantle disinformation networks. What it does is make criticism traceable, dissent measurable, and accountability reversible. It turns speech into something you must justify before you are allowed to exercise it.
And somewhere inside Malacañang Palace, there seems to be a genuine belief that by some miracle, bots, trolls, and disinformation will stop once everyone’s name is on file. That belief is fantasy.
We have already watched this exact logic fail. Remember SIM card registration? Same fear. Same promise. Same confidence that criminals would disappear once everyone was registered. What actually happened was brutally predictable. Ordinary people complied. Criminals adapted. Scam texts never stopped. Fraud calls never slowed. The only lasting result was another massive database of personal information, quietly expanding the damage when something inevitably leaks.
Nothing fundamental changed.
Scammers did not retreat. They optimized. Mule SIMs. Fake identities. Offshore gateways. Middlemen. Workarounds built faster than officials could announce success. The compliant were exposed. The competent were untouched. The government still congratulated itself.
Now the same failure is being scaled up and aimed at speech.
Bots are not people. They do not register. They do not comply. They do not fear policy memos. They are scripts spun up by the thousands, hosted anywhere, recycled endlessly. You do not stop bots with verification rules. You stop them with platform enforcement, technical countermeasures, and by going after whoever is paying for them.
Trolls are not random anonymous citizens either. In the Philippines, trolls are organized labor. Paid. Managed. Scheduled. They work shifts. They follow scripts. They answer to coordinators. Many already operate under real names, verified accounts, influencers, even media platforms. Some are loud, proud, and well-connected. Verification does nothing to them because they were never hiding in the first place.
So when Malacañang talks about stopping bots and trolls through mandatory verification, it reveals either a profound misunderstanding of the problem or a deliberate misdirection.
Disinformation is not a side effect of anonymity. It is a business model. It is coordinated. It is funded. It is protected. Troll farms do not survive because citizens lack IDs. They survive because no one follows the money far enough, and no one wants to prosecute the people who benefit from the lies. Corruption works the same way. It does not persist because citizens speak anonymously. It persists because enforcement stops short and accountability quietly expires.
Mandatory verification does not dismantle troll networks. It does not stop bots. It does not touch funding, coordination, or protection.
What it does is strip anonymity from the people who actually need it. Whistleblowers. Critics. Journalists. Ordinary citizens who still believe they should be able to speak without first calculating whether their job, family, or safety can absorb the consequences. Remove anonymity and abuse does not disappear. Criticism does. Fear becomes efficient. Silence becomes rational.
If SIM registration actually worked, scam messages would not still be flooding phones today. That alone should have buried this idea permanently. Instead, the failure has been repackaged and pointed at speech, which is far more dangerous than phone numbers.
The real work remains untouched. Dismantle organized troll operations. Follow the money behind disinformation campaigns. Enforce transparency in political advertising. Prosecute corruption cases all the way to conviction, not exhaustion. Strengthen independent media instead of policing the audience. Invest in education and media literacy instead of surveillance.
But that work is hard.
It upsets allies.
It requires competence, persistence, and spine.
Verification is easy. Databases are easy. Mandates are easy. They create the appearance of action while shifting blame downward. When bots and trolls inevitably continue, the excuse will already be prepared. The public failed. The internet failed.
Free speech failed.
Never the institutions.
Never enforcement.
Never corruption.
Believing that bots and trolls will stop because of mandatory verification is not optimism. It is magical thinking masquerading as policy. Or worse, it is knowing exactly what will not stop, and proceeding anyway because control, not truth, is the real objective.
We tried this already.
It failed.
Repeating it is not ignorance. It is a choice.